The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. n - Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. //--> Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Sovereignty - Wikipedia Nature (journal) - Wikipedia The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). 117. editor decision started under consideration. who will be interested in the new results and why. Hello. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. - b. //-->How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. [CDATA[// >How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. #AcademicChatter" ]]> Thank you for visiting nature.com. How do I get published in Nature or Science? Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing.
Mainfreight Owner Driver Jobs, Cigar Roller For Wedding, Zapruder Film Missing Frames, Articles E