";s:4:"text";s:28094:"Nasa found something. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? Sol. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? for only $16.05 $11/page. You can't just hope for the best. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Q: But isn't everything really connected? A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. What tH LP D (k)ow!? - RationalWiki She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. Dr Candice Pert Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Down The Rabbit Hole\". On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. Questions about What the Bleep Do We Know? : askscience Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. subscription. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? (2004) - IMDb Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. He claims the drop was achieved. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. The observer can't be ignored." What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). " " " !". In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. . Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". FILM IN REVIEW; 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. They don't go anywhere, Fred. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. IE 11 is not supported. is released on Friday. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. 8. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. 1. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . That's not always true, but it's often true. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. 1. That would be, very hard to quantify:). And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. What are some of the ocean conspiracy theories that you actually The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. There's nothing wrong with that. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes We That's not the case. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. What Does The Movie "What The Bleep Do We Know" Mean? | Teaching of The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. It is just a movie. Answer: Photographer. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. . Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. That's its claim anyway. "What The Bleep Do We Know? It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. So far, so good. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". Moreover, assume that they want your money. We're such a shallow people. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Q: You do see that in some science . Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. Do We (K)now!? The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. This message will appear once per week Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far - Rendicin de Cuentas What the Bleep Do We Know!? Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. How to spot quantum quackery - NBC NewsWhat the Bleep Do We Know!? | Movies | The Guardian On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. Thorough debunking of that shlock "What The Bleep Do We Know?" - Yelp "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. 2. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. Fred Allen Wolf Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. It was one of the most important moments in history. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. That's why we experience a classical world. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" A: Absolutely. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. What the (Bleep) Were They Thinking? - Skeptico For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. What the Bleep Do We Know? DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR - eBay No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. What the #$*! Do We Know!? (Film) - TV Tropes "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. 6. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? - Letterboxd Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. ";s:7:"keyword";s:34:"what the bleep do we know debunked";s:5:"links";s:469:"Bracewell London Salary,
Karen Chamblee Scottsdale,
Articles W
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}